You sure get a lot of content for your credits. Yes, currently Civ V might be better value for money. So for Civ VI they are doing exactly the same as for Civ V, yet for some reason people hail Civ V and not VI. They then released multiple smaller DLCs, followed by two expansions each costing 30 credits (pounds, dollars, euros, etc.) at release. Civ V at launch had the same issues as, if not more than, Civ VI at launch. There will be few more games besides Civ6, and some of those might be good, right? However, humble monthly isnt that costly, so probably its worth 12$. So, i'd say don't purchase Civ6 until there will be at least few Expansion-size DLCs (not just 'good news, everyone! you can pay 5$ to play as Australia now!') and major discounts. Devs stole money-milking strategy from EA: they release demo at price of AAA-project and, like, 'you gotta pay x20 times more to get full version'. And Civ5 with all and everything isnt just better and fuller than Civ6 in current condition, but also is cheaper than Civ6. Rise and Fall alone costs about half of base game. People say that DLCs will fix that, and theres soon Rise and Fall coming, but. It feels like base The Sims without any DLCs. Originally posted by lonenaco:Stay on Civ5.